Skip to main content

Optimizing Class II Restorations: The Role of Bitewing Radiography and the Quad Matrix System

Dr. Anand Ramakant Narvekar

Download

Introduction

Dental radiography plays a crucial role in diagnosing conditions that cannot be seen with the naked eye. Among the various types of intraoral X-rays, bitewing radiographs stand out for their unparalleled value in early detection of dental problems. Small, quick, and highly informative, bitewings are widely regarded as an essential component of routine dental care.

This case highlights the diagnosis and management of early Class II lesions using a contemporary matrix system — the Quad Matrix by Garrison — combined with Shofu’s bioactive composite restorative material. 

Case History

A 35-year-old female patient reported to our dental clinic with complaints of sensitivity in the maxillary left quadrant, particularly associated with tooth #16. On clinical examination, we observed an old silver amalgam restoration on that tooth with marginal breakdown and small chipping near mesial part of distobuccal cusp. Additionally, a greyish discoloration was noted on the mesial surface of the adjacent tooth #15, raising suspicion of underlying decay. Figure 01 An initial IOPA radiograph did not yield a definitive diagnosis; therefore, a bitewing radiograph was taken, which clearly revealed a distinct Class II mesial defect on tooth #15. Figures 02 and 03. 

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1. #16 Old silver amalgam with some part of chipped tooth structure a grayish discoloration was noted on the mesial surface of the adjacent tooth #15 
 
Figure 2. IOPA and Bitewing collage shows difference in diagnosis of class 2 defect. 
 
Figure 3
Figure 3. The AI in-house software from the Nano PIX X-ray unit clearly detected a Class II defect on the bitewing radiograph, whereas none was identified on the IOPA. 
 

Treatment Protocol

We began by using a small round bur to initiate drilling on tooth #15 at the suspected entry point along the mesial groove and discovered a typical Class II carious lesion (Figure 4). We then decided to place a rubber dam before proceeding with the rest of the treatment. 
Rubber Dam Isolation achieved using a wingless clamp with heavy rubber dam to achieve optimal bonding and increase the longevity of the restoration. Proper isolation is crucial for a successful adhesive process.

Silver/ Caries Removal: Silver restoration removed carefully using high speed round bur. Utilize caries dye for the thorough removal of carious tissue in teeth #15/#16 (Figure 5), infected caries is removed using slow speed round carbide bur with use of caries dye. It is essential to establish a peripheral seal zone free from infected and affected dentine to ensure the best bonding strength. 

Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 4. After initial drilling as suspected classical Class 2 defect. 
 
Figure 5. After removal of silver amalgam restoration / decay from tooth #16. Where as #15 shows infected dentine highlighted by caries dye. 
 
Figure 6. After Caries removal, achieving peripheral zone and air abrasion, ready to restore. 
 

Enamel / Proximal Box Preparation: Remove all unsupported enamel using a Super Fine Diamond Bur (yellow band). Contact broken in order to place the matrix band perfectly.

Finish the proximal walls with Shofu Super-Snap disks: start with the violet disk, followed by green and pink disks. This approach ensures optimal bonding to the enamel and helps prevent potential microleakage. Air particle abrasion using 25-micron aluminum oxide powder for more than 5 secs. This process cleans the cavity preparation and enhances bonding strength. Figure 6

We began with restoring first tooth #16 , After applying the bonding agent, we used a thin layer of Shofu Injectable Xsl—a high-strength, self-levelling, 2nd generation injectable material—to seal the dentine. This initial layer, approximately 0.5 mm thick, is crucial for protecting the hybrid layer from shrinkage stress. The self-levelling properties of this material allow it to effectively adapt to uneven surfaces, ensuring a smooth application without air bubbles and minimizing post-operative sensitivity…..NO CURE. Then we placed Ribbond Fibers (dipped in the unfilled resin) in 2 directions as per the cavity design and then cured all together. Figure 7

Figure 7
Figure 7. Ribbond Fiber placement in 02directions as per the defect along with thin layer of Shofu Injectable Xsl A2O shade. 
 

Ribbond fibers are ideal in Class I cavities due to High C factor, this will even reinforce the composite restoration and improve its fracture resistance — especially in teeth that are structurally compromised or wider defect like in this case. 

  • Crack resistance: The polyethylene fiber mesh resists crack propagation within the composite, increasing longevity of the restoration
  • Stress distribution: Ribbond helps distribute occlusal stresses more evenly across the restoration and tooth structure. 

After the protecting hybrid layer, we began incremental, cusp-by-cusp morphological layering technique. using Shofu Bioactive composite Shade A2. Figure 7. Once these restorations were completed, we proceeded to the critical step of addressing the Class II defect on tooth #15. 

Selecting the appropriate sectional matrix system is crucial in class 2 defect cases so we chose Garrison Quad system. It is not true that the Quad matrix system can be used only for adjacent class 2 defects. It works very well in single class 2 as well more efficiently.

It is essential to ensure that the marginal ridge is correctly dimensioned and aligns with the occlusal anatomy. This alignment is vital for creating well-defined adjacent triangular fossae and a properly shaped occlusal embrasure. Therefore, the height of the marginal ridge largely depends on the choice of band height. Here we chose Firm band FXH 175 

The firmness of the band material facilitates easy placement and secure fitting, the bands maintain their shape and do not distort during layering the composite ensuring accurate and reliable restoration outcomes. The band is secured with a Quad blue wedge, selected based on fitting firmness - a larger wedge is chosen if the fit is loose. Proper placement involves passing both arms of the wedge to the other side. Given the Class 2 defect’s location in the middle area with equal tooth structure on both sides, a buccal-to-palatal wedge placement was used, following the classical approach. Figure 7

After placing and securing the band and wedge, photos were taken to ensure 100% seal.

Once the band is securely in place, the Quad ring is selected and positioned with its driver tip on the buccal side, following the placement of the wedge from the palatal. Figure 8 

After completing the bonding procedure, a thin (approximately 0.5 mm) coat of Shofu Injectable XSL — a high-strength, self-levelling, second-generation injectable material — was applied to seal the dentine. This initial layer is essential for protecting the hybrid layer against polymerisation shrinkage stress. Thanks to its self-levelling nature, it adapts well to irregular surfaces, providing a smooth, bubble-free seal and helping to reduce post-operative sensitivity.

The restoration was then built up using an incremental anatomical layering technique with Shofu Beautifil LS II in shade A2. Finally, brown tint was added to mimic natural fissure staining and enhance the lifelike appearance of the restoration. After curing from all sides, the band and wedge are removed. Due to the rigidity of the band no excess flange and over contoured seen due to placing adjacent band. Figure 9 

Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 8. After Completion of restoring tooth#16 using incremental cusp by cusp buildup using Shofu Bioactive composite. Placement of FXH 175 firm band secured with the Quad orange wedge, checking the proximal seal. 
 
Figure 9. The Quad ring was placed with its driver tip from the buccal side. 
 

The contours and embrasures were well established and finished using a Shofu Super Snap purple disk. The oxygen inhibition layer was removed using sodium bicarbonate powder with an air polisher unit.

A rubber dam was removed, and high points were checked using 40-micron paper, followed by 8-micron foil in static occlusion. For dynamic occlusion, 200-micron paper was used, and adjustments were made to the cuspal slopes and non-functional cusps. Finishing and Polishing Protocols:

  • Finishing and margination of the occlusal surface were performed with a DuraGreen Stone.
  • Polishing was done with SHOFU OneGloss MidiPoints.
  • Super polishing was achieved with SuperBuff impregnated discs to provide a high gloss and an extra enamel-like luster. 
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 10. After restoring Class II defect           Figure 11. A different angle highlights the ideal height of the marginal ridge, with no excess composite and a natural-looking morphology. 
 

Conclusion

Bitewing X-rays are invaluable for early detection of hidden pathology, tracking disease progression, and supporting timely, appropriate treatment. When combined with meticulous clinical examination using high-magnification loupes and high-quality photography, they greatly enhance diagnostic accuracy and make the path to a precise diagnosis much smoother.

Class II restorations — whether simple or complex — can be challenging, and many failures in restorative dentistry stem from not using a well-designed matrix system.

The Garrison Quad Matrix System has been created to simplify demanding cases, such as multiple Class II restorations in a single quadrant. Its drawn-wire nickel-titanium construction provides strong separating force, while the Soft-Face™ tips closely adapt to tooth contours.

This is particularly beneficial as it saves time and materials by minimising the need to trim or remove excess composite.

The wedge design is another major benefit. Quad Wedges with a split-tip, used in combination with the special driver tips on the rings, create a tight seal on both sides — whether you are working on single or adjacent cavities. The asymmetrical tip design allows for better ring adaptation, matrix stability, and enhanced tooth separation. Altogether, these features are essential for achieving excellent outcomes across all types of Class II restorations, from straightforward to complex. 

Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 12. 2 weeks post op shows natural looking restorations. 
 
Figure 13. Before and after shows natural form and functionally restored teeth
 

About the Author

 NarvekarAnand_Headshot.jpg

Dr. Anand Ramakant Narvekar

Since his graduation from Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College, Pune in 1996, Dr. Anand has immersed himself in the field of dentistry with a special focus on aesthetic dentistry. His prime interest lies in treating complex full mouth rehabilitation and smile design where management of occlusal disorders and restoration of a balanced occlusion are key components in his restorative treatment protocol.

His keen eye for aesthetics extends beyond dentistry as he is an avid and globally acclaimed photographer with his photography appearing in a wide variety of publications, including dental, travel, auto media, wildlife, health, and architecture. He is a mentor at the leading photography forum, The Photography Club of India.

Dr. Anand’s dental work is reflected in leading Asian dental magazines and publications. He is an adjunct faculty member at various private dental institutes as well as an MICD fellow and certified Clinical trainer for Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Dentistry (MICD). Recently he was honored as a Fellow of the Bangladesh Academy of Dentistry International.