Skip to main content

Quad Matrix System B2B Class II Restoration

Dr. Matthew Burton, DDS

Download

Garrison® Quad Matrix System™ Quadrant Direct Case MO–DO Back-to-Back + single Class II Ring Stack

Case Details: 

Figure 1a
Figure 1b

Patient is a 20-year-old male with failing composite restorations. He reports the restorations were done about two years ago, and he keeps getting food stuck when he eats. Clinical and radiographic exam shows failing existing Class II direct restorations. Open contacts were present, along with chipped marginal ridge forms. This was causing food impaction, secondary caries, and gingival irritation/inflammation. Furthermore, there are multiple overhanging margins present, which irritate the gingival tissues and trap food, resulting in Class II restoration failure. Since the upper left was the most sensitive area for the patient, we elected to begin with #14–MO, #13–MO & #12–DO.

Figure 2

Patient was anesthetized and failing composite restorations were removed with an 856-016 diamond bur. The margins were finished with a Meisinger Fine Flame. All contacts were broken. As is common with failing Class II composite restoration removal, the gingival tissue was very inflamed and irritated. It is important to get this under control for improved vision and access to the restorative field.

Figure 3

A hemostatic paste, Traxodent, was placed on the irritated gingival tissues for three minutes and then rinsed off.

Figure 4

Field is now clear and the gingival tissues are under control for restoration placement. Notice the concave shape to the mesial gingival margin of #14. These slight concavities are difficult to seal and can result in flash or contamination of the restorative filed. Furthermore, if you look at this image, along with the pre-op bitewing, you will notice the uneven margins on #12–DO and #13–MO. When performing back-to-back restorations, uneven margins are common and can be difficult to securely wedge/seal both margins with a single wedge.

Figure 5

Vitrebond Line was placed on the dentin of #12, 13, and 14. The teeth were etched with 35% acid for 30 seconds and rinsed. The matrix bands and wedges were placed. Since #14 was an isolated (non-back-to-back), a 3D Fusion™ Matrix band was utilized. With the concave gingival margin shape, an anatomical Quad Wedge was placed (purple). This wedge contains a convex feature, allowing concave shaped gingival margins to be accurately sealed. Image shows a quality seal on the gingival margin #14.

Figure 6

On the #12 and 13 back-to-back Class IIs, 3.5mm Garrison Firm Matrix Bands were placed. The Firm Matrix Bands ensure proper matrix band contour for back-toback situations. A medium Quad Wedge (orange) was placed. Notice how the splitting wing feature of the Quad Wedge allows simultaneous seal of both margins (#12 and #13) with a single wedge.

Figure 7

Following matrix and wedge placement, Quad Rings were placed. The first ring placed was the Quad universal ring (blue) in between #12 and 13. The universal ring was placed first, allowing the tall Quad ring (yellow) to sit over the shorter universal ring. The Quad ring has an asymmetrical tip design. The “driver tip,” which is designated by the black arrow on top of the ring pad (see image) is designed to engage in-between the splitting wings of the Quad wedge. This interaction is unique, and allows excellent gingival seal, flash control, and contact formation. Furthermore, the splitting Quad wedge and the Quad ring synergy create an environment for back-toback Class II restorations to be placed simultaneously. Once the rings are in position, a dycal instrument was used to lightly burnish the matrix bands to ensure a smooth surface prior to restoration placement.

Figure 8

The most distal restoration, #14, was completed first. Scotchbond (3M), Surefil SDR (Dentsply) and Filtek Supreme (3M) were utilized in the restoration. Please note that ScotchBond was placed on all teeth: #12, 13, and 14 at this stage.

Figure 9

Following polymerization of #14, the Quad ring on #14 was removed. This sequencing in quadrant direct dentistry helps ensure that you achieve adequate ring force separation when placing multiple rings. Following removal of the tall Quad ring (yellow), simultaneous restoration placement in the back-to-back situation #12–13 begins.

Figure 10

Surefil SDR (Dentsply) is placed in the box, followed immediately by heated Filtek Supreme (3M). This snowplow technique ensures sealed gingival margins and inhibits air bubbles of the restoration material at the margins. The Class II is turned into a Class I. Layering in this way helps decrease polymerization stress on the teeth being restored.

Figure 11

Final layer of the Filtek Supreme (3M) is placed in the occlusal portion of #12 and 13. Please note that the same method (Class II to Class I with snowplow) was utilized for #14. All restorations are placed. Following polymerization, the Universal Quad ring (blue), matrix bands, and Quad wedges are removed. Minor occlusal and marginal polishing is completed.

Figure 12a
Figure 12b

Final restorations and final bitewing images (taken to ensure a clean margin #14 mesial). Total treatment time was 43 minutes. It was in the best interest of the situation to allow time for the hemostatic agent to work, allowing excellent marginal seal and clear operator visibility during matrix and wedge placement. This step is time well spent!

About the Author

Dr. Matthew Burton, DDS

Dr. Matthew Burton, DDS has worked as an established dental practitioner in Illinois since 2008. Like most dentists, his schedule was filled with one of the most common procedures: the Class II composite restoration. After several years in his practice working on hundreds of fillings, Dr. Burton became frustrated with the available Class II matrix systems. He tried nearly every system, but none of them provided the efficiency and consistent results he was seeking. He found that the major difficulty lies in properly placing and wedging the matrix bands. If not performed correctly, it cost him valuable time, required unnecessary & timely post polymerization adjustments, and ultimately led to a lack of confidence in the procedure.

Learning from these every day Class 2 difficulties, Dr. Burton began contemplating new ideas to make his chair-side time more efficient. He discovered that he could simplify & streamline the Class II restoration process by simply re-designing the wedge to "split" down the middle. The flexible Split Wedge allows for proper gingival seal, perfect matrix contour, while greatly minimizing flash. He ultimately realized that the design of this wedge played a critical role in achieving excellent outcomes in an incredibly efficient way. With no other products like it on the market, Dr. Burton knew there would be demand for his matrix systems. In 2017, he formed Burton Dental Innovations to begin marketing and selling his products to other dentists who face the same challenges in their own practices. Furthermore, Dr. Burton has recently engaged with Garrison Dental Solutions to create an advanced matrix ring system that will launch in early 2024.

Dr. Burton also enjoys testing new “forward thinking” technology, and embraces these advancements as crucial to office efficiency and case outcome. He has realized the importance of digital scanning and how software integration platforms are a key element to utilizing scan data. 3D printing, Intraoral Scanning, and digital smile software are the future of dentistry. It is time for offices to begin understanding what this technology is and, more importantly, how it can be practically integrated and become extremely effective on a daily basis.

Dr. Burton began teaching CE courses to dentists around the world in July 2020 and is enthusiastic to continue to share what he has learned and how it has helped shape a high level of care in his office.